Headlines From Our Twitter Feed

Showing posts with label caribbean. Show all posts
Showing posts with label caribbean. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Post-Brexit In The Western Hemisphere


Feature

Tiberiu Dianu


















Brexit: The Message

On June 23, 2016, the majority of the United Kingdom’s population –
52% vs. 48% (outside the margin of error, that is) – has decided to
vote for exiting the European Union (turnout was 72%). Apparently,
the vote was marked by a generational divide. Recent polls, starting
with 2015 to date, have shown that 75% of voters aged 18-24 were
pro-stay, while 67% of voters 65 years and older were pro-leave. As
an addendum, the British overseas territories had no say in the Thurs-
day referendum.

In practical and rhetorical terms, this means a vote for: nationalism, in-
dependence, and border security. Consequently, this means a vote again-
st: globalism, Brussels’ bureaucracy, and immigration. It meant also a vo-
te for true freedom of speech, individualism, and assimilationism, and, co-
nsequently, a vote against political correctness, establishment, and multi-
culturalism.

Brexit does not reflect an over-night change in people’s vision, but ra-
ther an embryonic state since the 1973 accession of the UK to the EU,
adding in time layers of dissatisfaction and  frustration. This has evol-
ved from economic issues (trades and tariffs) to national security issues
(the Islamic terrorist attacks in London between 2005 and 2015,  Paris,
in January and November 2015, and Brussels, in April 2016, committed
by either citizens or immigrants, including political refugees).

What's next? Procedure of leaving the EU

Brexit is an advisory vote, and the British government can legally ignore
the referendum results. But the political reality will push the executive to
respect the popular vote. The UK will not exit the EU next week, or next
month, and not even next year. It is a process in the making, and it might
take at least two years until it will have become complete. There are many
issues to be clarified, readjusted, renegotiated, and reconstructed related to:
trade, currency, citizenship, governance, and security, among others. Even
the replacement procedure for the outgoing premier David Cameron will
take at least two months or even longer.

Art. 50 of the 2007 Lisbon Treaty on European Union establishes the pro-
cedures for both withdrawal and rejoining. In short, the executive head (pre-
mier, for the UK) of the member state which decides to withdraw shall no-
tify the European Council (the EU executive branch) of its intention, and
the EU “shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that member state.”
The agreement shall be concluded by the Council, with a qualified majori-
ty of the member states, after obtaining approval from the European Parlia-
ment.

Then, the EU treaty shall cease to apply to the member state in question fr-
om the date the agreement is enforced. However, if the agreement is not acc-
epted by the British people, a second referendum might be held, in order to
see if the voters accept the negotiated agreement. If the voters do not accept
the agreement, there is the possibility for the UK to leave the EU unilaterally,
by rejecting the negotiations. But forcing the exit without agreed terms might
put the UK in a risky position, leaving it, for instance, without a free trade ag-
reement, and being imposed of tariffs on some UK-EU trade. In this last situa-
tion, the EU treaty shall cease to apply to the member state in question within
a two-year period after the notification of that member state.

The idea of a second referendum seems to be favored by Boris Johnson, the
presumptive Conservative leader. Johnson, a former London mayor, has ad-
vocated for Brexit, unlike David Cameron and the current mayor and Trump-
detractor, Sadiq Khan (now copiously booed by the over-joyous Brexiters).
Curious enough (or maybe not), Johnson bears a striking resemblance, not
only in ideology, but also in looks, with Donald Trump. Who, by the way,
during the British referendum, was nearby, in neighboring Scotland, in ord-
er to promote his golf courses, and praised the Brexiters for their victory.

Post-Brexit for the United Kingdom

Brexit has given the UK the possibility to emerge as a new power pole in
global politics. Not that the UK was not a great power before. But now, fo-
llowing a divorce from the EU, the British will focus on creating a renew-
ed architecture from the (former British) Commonwealth of Nations. We
will see in the near future more actions that advocate for more UK engage-
ment with overseas territories, in terms of sustainable development, ocean
governance, immigration, and social issues. These steps will continue pre-
vious similar initiatives, that emerged in the early 2000s.  It has to be men-
tioned that the British overseas territories were not part of the referendum
vote.

After the Brexit vote, an immediate effect of Brexit was on the stock exch-
ange and the British pound. My earlier prediction came true, and the pound 
took a significant plunge, by about 8%, to its weakest level in three decades
-- from US$1.57 on Friday, June 26, 2015 to US$1.36 on Friday, June 24,
2016, and US$1.33 in the last days of June.  Globalists should not jubilate,
though. In spite of the initial shock of the stock exchange market, this will
not have long-lasting effects. Most of the large UK stock market compone-
nts (like banks and commodity stocks) will be, in large part, unaffected by
the country’s relationship with the EU, while many British export compan-
ies would benefit from a cheaper pound.

In terms of commerce, the UK can cut trade deals with the EU and other
partners outside the EU. But ultimately, if no deal would be forthcoming,
the country could also cut import duties on its own.

Militarily, the UK has signaled to its NATO allies that national interests are
to be given increased attention over the EU ones.  The EU interests include
Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and elsewhere. Consequently, the country
has shown less inclination to take on global challenges, at least in the short
term. It is also a signal for reviewing NATO’s role, construction, principles,
and goals. It is expected that the upcoming NATO summit in Warsaw, on
July 8 and 9, to reflect exactly that.

Post-Brexit for the United States

On political discourse level, Brexit serves as a predictor for the US presid-
ential elections in November. The debate has been about anti-establishment
bureaucracy and status quo, nationalism, sovereignty, and borders control,
and all these factors are present in the American elections narrative, as well.

Financially, in short and medium terms, Brexit will affect the US dollar, sto-
cks and bonds. The dollar rise (compared with both the pound and euro) will
limit the US exports in Europe. Retirement funds invested in stocks will also
be affected, while treasury bonds will decrease their ability to deliver signifi-
cant income for savers and investors.

The good news for investors is that the Federal Reserve will not raise the sh-
ort-term interest rate (now it is between 0.25% and 0.5%), probably until the 
end of the year.

Mortgage rates and house prices will drop, and the US housing market will
reinvigorate. Tourism in Europe will intensify.

On national security grounds, the US will have the opportunity to enhance
its cooperation with the UK within the  Five Eyes (in short, FVEY) intellig-
ence organization. FVEY, an intelligence alliance established in the last yea-
rs of the World War 2, includes other three English-speaking members (Can-
ada, Australia, and New Zealand). This is important to point out, because the
other EU member states (in particular, France and Germany) have, more oft-
en than not, other regional interests than the US and the rest of the FVEY
members.

Regionally, the Western Hemisphere will have two -- more defined -- major
players, the United States and the United Kingdom. They will divide, to the
most part, the vast areas of the north Atlantic region, the Caribbean basin,
and the Pacific zone.

Post-Brexit for the Caribbean and Pacific nations

In a post-Brexit era, some British commonwealth nations (American/Carib-
bean, African, Asian, and Australian/Pacific) will take concrete measures, in-
volving new forms of association, depending on their own regional – politi-
cal, administrative, economic, and trade -- interests.

North America and Oceania have a total number of members of 23 nations
in the British Commonwealth. Predicting economic and trade trends for all
these English-speaking countries is important because with Brexit another
world power pole emerges, namely a redesigned (British) Commonwealth
of Nations. And Brexit is the first brick in the new architecture of this nati-
ons bloc.

The British Commonwealth has 12 member countries in North America:
Canada and 11 Caribbean nations (Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barba-
dos, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Saint Kitts and Nevis,
Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines).

The Caribbean nations (in North, Central, and South America), on their part,
possess a wide array of regional economic organizations, but we will empha-
size in particular two of them: the Association of Caribbean States (ASC),
with 25 full members, and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), with 15
full members..A large part of them are English-speaking countries. The Engl-
ish-speaking countries are: parliamentary constitutional monarchies (domin-
ions or independent states, like Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, and Jamaica) –
with Queen Elizabeth II as their monarch and head of state – , republics (like
Dominica, Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago), and Dutch territories with English
as the official language, in addition to Dutch (like Sint Maarten).

These differences can make a difference in terms of trade with a post-Brexit
UK, on one hand, and the EU, on the other hand. The Caribbean English mon-
archies have a stronger connection with London, hence a narrower leverage of
negotiation with the EU, other states or trade blocs. In contrast, the Caribbean
republics, including the Dutch English-speaking territory of Sint Maarten, can
exercise more flexibly their negotiation leverage with other states, due to their
loose connection with London.

In the last years, the 15 CARICOM countries (Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas,
Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Montserrat,
Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines,Suriname,
Trinidad and Tobago), and the Dominican Republic (with which they make up
together CARIFORUM) have been strengthening their ties with each other, in
order to play a more solid role in global trade. Also, they are in a process of ex-
tending their trade connections with 17 territories in the Caribbeans with direct
links to some EU countries (4 French "outermost regions" plus 13 "overseas te-
rritories" -- 6 British, 6 Dutch, and 1 French).

In a post-Brexit era, the Caribbean nations, on their part, will need to enhance
and improve the free trade agreements they currently have with the EU (like
CARIFORUM), North America (NAFTA), South Asia, and other regions.

The Pacific nations (in Oceania) have 11 member states in the British Common-
wealth. Five of them are monarchies – with Queen Elizabeth II as their monarch
and head of state (Australia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands,
and Tuvalu), one is a monarchy with its own monarch (Tonga), and five republics
(Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Samoa, and Vanuatu).

Because of the small amount of land and limited resources (except Australia,
New Zealand, and Papua New Guinea), the trade relations of the Pacific nations
consist of economies in transition to a developed economy and infrastructure.
The smallest Pacific nations rely on trade with Australia, New Zealand, and the
United States for exports of goods and accession to other products (like cars, el-
ectrical equipment, machinery, and clothes).

The main trade blocs of the area are the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
(APEC) and the East Asia Summit (EAS). Currently, APEC has 23 members
(among them, Australia, New Zealand, and Papua New Guinea), while EAS has
18 members (including Australia and New Zealand). A Pacific Island Countries
Trade Agreement (PICTA) is in the process of being implemented by 2020. The
aforementioned remarks, related to trade impact on the countries’ different status
(monarchy with British monarch, monarchy with own monarch, and republic),
remain valid for the Pacific nations, too.

Post-Brexit for the European Union

The EU has been developing its own bilateral trade agreements, or is in negotia-
tion for such agreements, with the English-speaking Caribbean nations, and also
with Spanish-speaking nations in the area, like Dominican Republic and Puerto
Rico. After the US, the EU is CARIFORUM's second largest trading partner.

Post-Brexit could mean different things for different territories. For instance,
there are some UK territories – like the Cayman Islands -- that receive signific-
ant support from the EU (e.g., a new radar system, which plays an important role
in the area’s hurricane data). Cayman will be a different issue, due to its challen-
ges in the financial services sector. Caymanians holders of UK passports will face
limitations of freedom to live, work or study in Europe, compared with the prev-
ious period.

As for the Pacific nations,  the EU has free trade agreements with Fiji, New
Caledonia, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands, and agreements in nego-
tiation with New Zealand.

The EU is also negotiating a comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement
with all Pacific nations, building on its interim agreements with Fiji and Papua
New Guinea.

“The Times They Are A Changin’”

The choirs of lamenters were always right on short term. But in the long run,
new horizons will always be in front of us. Most probably, the UK will smoo-
thly slide, with a renewed – non-European -- leader role, into its (British) Co-
mmonwealth of Nations (established in 1931), and will be evolving from now
on as a new world political power pole.

Precedents like the Swiss confederation or the former British empire have pro-
ven durability in time to us, provided that a majority of people involved is ready
to sustain such political constructions. And Brexit has succeeded exactly becau-
se a majority of people involved has indicated such sustainment.

Nowadays we are witnessing world changes again. So far, the UK has been con-
sidered by some to be the EU’s fifth wheel of the cart, but in a post-Brexit era it
has all the chances of becoming the Commonwealth of Nations’ first wheel of
the bicycle.

If in the future Brexit were to serve as an example for similar movements --
like Byegium, Czechout, Deportugal, Donegary, Finish, Italeave, Latervia,
Nexit (or Nethermind), or Oustria --, this would be an issue that remains to
be confirmed.



Tiberiu Dianu is a legal scholar, book author, graduate of the American University Washington 
College of Law in Washington, DC, the University of Manchester Faculty of Law in Manchester, 
UK, and an exchange scholar of the Oxford University in Oxford, UK. He currently lives in Wa-
shington, DC and works for various government and private agencies. The opinions expressed
in the preceding article are those of the author alone and do not necessarily represent the views 
of The Puerto Rico Monitor, its editors or advertisers.




Tuesday, June 21, 2016

A Brexit Round Trip Across The Pond: To Be or Not To Be?


















Commentary

Tiberiu Dianu


That is the question. On June 23, the United Kingdom will vote either to remain
in the European Union, or to leave it, the so-called “Brexit.”

Not such a long time ago, the camp of the status quo supporters seemed robust.
But lately, polls have shown trends reversals, in the sense that Brexit has actually
gained momentum. In May 2016, An Ipsos MORI telephone survey showed a 55
 to 37 ratio of voters for the status quo (with the rest being undecided) , while a
June 16 survey indicated a 53 to 47 ratio (with no undecided) for the Brexit -- also
known as “No, thanks” supporters.

No matter what the final results will be, changes are expected within the EU poli-
tical construction.


Why do the Brits want to exit the EU?

There are several reasons. The UK itself used to be, in its colonial times, and still
is, as a (formerly British) Commonwealth of Nations, a political construction much
larger that the EU itself. Then, as a “mother country” for the US, it has been consi-
dered by many as the European turntable for America (or the other way around, de-
pending on whom you talk with). In addition to that, the UK is a nuclear power. Oth-
er reasons include: satiety for the Brussels bureaucracy; distaste for the German-Fr-
ench dominance of the EU, with both of them being in a visible rapprochement with
Russia; and growing impatience with the EU, who constantly bails out member sta-
tes, less responsible financially, from their enormous debts (like Greece). While “Gr-
exit” was conceived as an EU sanction (but never applied), Brexit represents a local
parliament initiative conceived, among others, to halt (at least for London) the conti-
nuous flow of assets and resources from the nations of makers to the nations of takers.
Given the circumstances, it comes as no surprise that many British citizens’ attitudes
toward the EU mirror similar American  feelings, harbored against deals like NAFTA
or Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).


The Advent of Brexit

The British eurosceptic politicians have constantly advocated alternatives to the
UK membership in the EU. One of them was a Commonwealth free trade area. The
concept of a Commonwealth free trade area has been popularized by eurosceptics
well in advance the 2016 referendum, as a variant for a free trade treaty with the
EU.

On January 1, 1973, the UK and Gibraltar joined the EU (known then as the Euro-
pean Economic Community) under terms negotiated by the Conservative govern-
ment, then in power, through its leader, Edward Heath. The 1974 elections were
won by the Labor Party, who formed a minority administration and held a referen-
dum on continued membership in 1975, which was approved by 65% of the voters.
However, since withdrawal from the EU is a right of the member states, stipulated
by Article 50 of the 2007 Treaty on European Union, eurosceptic British Parliament
members have been having constant calls for a new referendum.

A 2010 report (see: The Royal Commonwealth Society: A Working Paper, pp. 
8-9)  has shown that: intra-Commonwealth trade (between members), is up to 50%
more than with a non-Commonwealth member; and smaller and less wealthy states
(like island members in the Caribbean and Pacific) have a higher propensity to trade
within the Commonwealth.

In 2012, the British eurosceptics had proposed already a Commonwealth free tra-
de zone,  although, at that time, such an idea had been labeled as “the ultimate Eu-
rosceptic fantasy.” On January 23, 2013, the Conservative prime minister David
Cameron proposed in his “Bloomberg speech”a renegotiation of the terms of the
UK membership and a new referendum on the EU membership.

In 2015, the UK Parliament passed the European Union Referendum Act, which
makes provision for the holding of a referendum no later than December 31, 2017.
Let us imagine several post-June 23 scenarios...


If the status quo prevails

We refer to an impact analysis on four levels: domestic (for the UK), regional (wi-
thin the EU), transatlantic (with the US), and international (which includes the Bri-
tish Commonwealth nations, and the world). Domestically, there is to be expected
a moderate -- more political than financial -- impact. The British political parties
will justify the results in their own way, and adjust their short- and medium-term
actions accordingly. The Bank of England will probably not intervene in sustaining
the sterling pound, although some “bulls and bears” might shake a bit the London
Stock Exchange after Friday, June 24.

Regionally, the UK will try to redefine its status within, and relationship with, the
EU based on the robustness of the victory percentages, or the lack thereof.

Bilaterally, with the US transatlantic partner, this will mean a folding on President
Obama’s position for the status quo, emphasized during his April meeting in Lon-
don with prime minister Cameron.

Internationally, with the UK remaining in the EU, other countries (the British co-
mmonwealth nations in particular, but also Russia and China) will perceive it as a
sign relative stability, in areas where social unrest and separatist movements emer-
ge from  time to time.


If Brexit prevails

An impact analysis applied to the same levels (domestic, regional-continental,
transatlantic-bilateral, and international) will reveal the following possible tre-
nds. Domestically, the sterling pound will plunge, in varied modulations: a good
reason for the Bank of England and other departments (British ministries) to inte-
rvene with emergency plans, based on their own money reserve availability. An-
other problem is the situation of the 1.3 million British residents in other EU co-
untries (especially in Spain, Ireland, and France), whose status should be clarifi-
ed in the near future by both  the British and EU authorities. Last but not least,
the British government will have to appoint more experts for the trade negotia-
tions with the EU.

Regionally, several EU leaders, including Italy’s center-left prime minister Ren-
zi, warned that Brexit would be a path of no return.  Other EU nations will put
in question the legitimacy of both the British euro-parliament members, and Eu-
ropean Commission experts. Some EU states will probably push for some deci-
sions to be taken, without the UK’s participation, where a unanimous vote is not
required. Symmetrically, the EU residents’ status in the UK will have to be clari-
fied (some of them will opt to stay, since later returns may prove more difficult).

Bilaterally, with the US, the British exit decision will probably receive mixed
signals, since the US itself is in full electoral swing this year. While the current
US administration may hint that a withdrawal could render the UK a less valua-
ble NATO ally, the US conservative circles may actually welcome the decision
and perceive it as an enhanced opportunity for a more flexible bilateral military
relationship with the ally across the pond.

Internationally, Brexit could seriously impact the surge of other European sepa-
ration movements, like in Scotland (the Scots are pro-EU), and Catalonia (the
Catalans are also pro-EU, but so are the Castilian people). In the case of these
two nations, if separations succeed, new negotiations and arrangements will be
necessary for their re-accession to the EU.

Elsewhere in the world, some British commonwealth nations (American/Caribb-
ean, African, Asian, and Australian/Pacific) will take concrete measures, of asso-
ciation or disassociation, depending on their own regional – political, administra-
tive, economic, and trade -- interests.


The Caribbean nations in a post-Brexit era

A special note for the Caribbean nations, since many of them are English-speak-
ing countries, and members of the (former British) Commonwealth of Nations. It
is important to predict possible post-Brexit economic and trade trends for all Eng-
lish-speaking countries, and particularly the Caribbean nations. The reason is a ve-
ry important one. Which is this: if Brexit occurs, we will have another world power
pole, namely the British Commonwealth redesigned. In other words, Brexit will be
the brick in the new architecture of the British Commonwealth of Nations.

The Caribbean nations, on their part, possess a wide array of regional economic
organizations, but we will emphasize in particular two of them: the Association
of Caribbean States (ASC) and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM).

ASC has 25 full member states, (initially 7, but currently) 12 associate member
states, and 20 observer states. CARICOM has 15 full members, 5 associates, and
8 observers. A large part of them are English-speaking countries (aside from the
Spanish-speaking, French-speaking, and Dutch-speaking countries). The English-
speaking countries fall into several categories: parliamentary constitutional monar-
chies (dominions or independent states, like Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, and Ja-
maica) – with Queen Elizabeth II as their monarch and head of state – , republics
(like Dominica, Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago), and Dutch territories with English
as the official language, in addition to Dutch (like Sint Maarten).

These differences may prove more or less important in terms of trade with a post-
Brexit UK, on one hand, and the EU, on the other hand. The Caribbean English mo-
narchies may have a narrower leverage of negotiation with the EU and other states
or group of states, due to their stronger connection to London. In contrast, the Cari-
bbean republics, including the Dutch English-speaking territory of Sint Maarten,
due to their loose connection with London, may actually exercise to a much larger
extent their margin of negotiations with the other world state entities.

In a possible post-Brexit era, the Caribbean nations, on their part, will need to en-
hance and improve the free trade agreements they currently have with the EU (like
CARIFORUM), North America (NAFTA), South Asia, and other regions.

On the other hand, the EU itself has been developing bilateral trade agreements,
or is in negotiation for such agreements, not only with the English-speaking Cari-
bbean nations, but with Spanish-speaking commonwealths, like Puerto Rico.

In conclusion, the time for an honest and efficient answer has come. The question
is: to what point the political constructions, based on inclusion adopted on the ex-
pense of national and local value differences, are viable and durable? Will a conti-
nuous reform work, or dismantling is the solution? Obviously, the British referen-
dum will put this to the test, and provide us with a long-awaited answer.




Tiberiu Dianu is a legal scholar, book author, graduate of the American University Washington 
College of Law in Washington, DC, the University of Manchester Faculty of Law in Manchester, 
UK, and an exchange scholar of the Oxford University in Oxford, UK. He currently lives in Wa-
shington, DC and works for various government and private agencies. The opinions expressed
in the preceding article are those of those of the author alone and do not necessarilly represent
 the views of The Puerto Rico Monitor, its editors or advertisers.



Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Will A New Cuba Hurt Puerto Rican Tourism?


Feature

Bill Alvarez

Old Havana, Cuba
Old Havana, Cuba
Source: Wikimedia
Varadero Beach, Cuba
Varadero Beach, Cuba
President Obama  surprised America and the world last year by revealing that he wants to start the process of normalizing relations with Cuba. This piece of news came shortly after the announcement that US contractor Alan Gross -- who had been held prisoner in Cuba for years -- was being exchanged for three Cuban spies who had been incarcerated in the US. This all represents a huge change in US-Cuba relations, which have been extremely strained -- to say the least -- since the communist takeover of the early 1960s. After more than 50 years of isolation, a trade embargo and practically no diplomatic contact between the two nations, Cuba now seems poised to further open itself to the world, especially to its giant, powerful neighbor to the north. Many Americans have been travelling to Cuba for years, although not officially as tourists. With an expected opening of Cuba-US trade and diplomacy, the number of Americans visiting Cuba will almost certainly skyrocket. But what does this mean for fellow Caribbean island Puerto Rico, and its tourism sector?
Puerto Ricans in the travel and tourism industries have long feared an "opening" of Cuba. Although seen by most as inevitable, such an opening always carried with it the threat of Cuba stealing whatever thunder Puerto Rico has as a Spanish-speaking, Caribbean destination. And there indeed are some real reasons to worry. If Cuba opens itself up to American tourism, visitors will find a destination with beaches, old buildings and natural attractions just as good as the ones in Puerto Rico, along with a great musical scene, cheap and delicious rum and premium coffee and cigars. And on top of that, everything will be cheaper than it is in PR. For the American tourist looking for a more "genuine" travel experience, Cuba offers practically no tacky American fast food joints or big box stores (for now!), relatively little crime or extreme poverty and a slower pace. As it is, millions of tourists from around the world already enjoy what Cuba has to offer. Cuba received 2.8 million tourists in 2013 (not counting any Americans or Cubans). While Puerto Rico received more visitors in 2013 (3.2 million), it did not have to deal with a commercial embargo, nor was it diplomatically isolated from much of the world. More ominously, in March 2014 (the most recent month for which we have data), Cuba received more visitors than Puerto Rico did (359,384 vs 182,599 arrivals). So you could say that the problems for PR on the tourism front have already started.
Luquillo, Puerto Rico
Luquillo, Puerto Rico
Old San Juan, PR
Old San Juan, PR
This is all not to say that Cuba does not face serious challenges, not only in the tourism sector, but across the board. Aging infrastructure is probably the largest obstacle. Also, some of that non-consumerist charm that Cuba has may also serve to repel certain potential visitors, especially convenience-conscious Americans, who expect destinations to have wifi, digital cable, 24 hour restaurants and other amenities. As tourism increases, a rise in crime and other social ills can also be expected, and to some extent this is already being seen. But can Cuba become a modern, state-of-the-art, world-class destination within the next decade? It absolutely can. And unless other Caribbean destinations like Puerto Rico can keep up, Cuba will steal a good part of their tourist arrivals.
Puerto Rico has long been trying to step up its tourism game, with mixed results. Unfortunately for the island, electricity costs have always been (and continue to be) relatively high, and labor costs are higher than in the rest of the area. Add to this potential visitors' concerns over the island's much-publicized imploding economy and its crime rate, and it's easy to see how someone trying to pick a Caribbean spot for vacation in the near future will find it easier to just choose Cuba. The one thing PR will still have over Cuba is that travel to the island from the US requires no passport (as it is a US territory) and American visitors can come with the knowledge that they have the safety of being under the US flag. That, however, doesn't seem to have helped PR take any tourist arrivals from emerging destinations like the Dominican Republic. While the tourism picture in Puerto Rico has shown some improvement, and continues to do so in some areas (cheaper real estate may be one driver), it's going to have to become very creative and diligent in the medium and long term in order to not lose scores of tourist arrivals to an ascendant Cuba. Whatever the case, Americans visiting the Caribbean in the following years will have one more option when choosing a destination.

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Puerto Rico News Digest For February 4, 2016


CARIBBEAN CONCERNED OVER ZIKA EFFECTS




















From Caribbean Business:

"As an increasing number of Caribbean holidays and conferences are
cancelled due to the growing concern over the Zika virus, regional health
officials are sounding the alarm about the negative consequences that this
may have on the heavily tourism-dependent region. “We would like to send
a message to travelers coming to the Caribbean: Don’t let the mosquitoes ruin
your travel,” exhorted Dr. Lisa Indar of the Caribbean Public Health Agency
(CPHA). While there is no vaccine to prevent contracting Zika or medicine to
treat Zika, travelers can protect themselves against Zika and other mosquito-
borne infections like Chikungunya and dengue by preventing mosquito bites..."


PANEL WARNS ON PR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM


From News Is My Business:

The prognosis for Puerto Rico’s health system is already critical and will only
get worse if Congress doesn’t act fast, warned a panel of doctors and finance
experts meeting on Capitol Hill this week. The briefing, organized by the Puerto
Rico Health Care Crisis Coalition (PRHCC) and the Congressional Hispanic Cau-
cus, also featured comments by three sympathetic Democrats: House Minority
Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland, Rep. José Serrano of New York, and Puerto Ri-
co’s non-voting Resident Commissioner, Pedro Pierluisi. “Congress has held se-
ven hearings on the island’s fiscal crisis in the last 12 months, including one this
morning in the House Natural Resources Committee,” which will soon draft a le-
gislative package on Puerto Rico, said Pierluisi..."


WAL-MART SUES PR OVER TAX HIKE


From Retail Dive:

"Puerto Rico, in the midst of a financial crisis, is in federal court battling Wal-
Mart Stores Inc. over a new hike in taxes on goods that retailers bring to the
island to sell. The island government raised the tax from 2% to 6.5% in May,
and Wal-Mart responded with a lawsuit contending that the tax is aimed at it
in particular and effectively makes its income tax burden 91.5%..."


13 CUBAN MIGRANTS DETAINED NEAR PR


From Voice of America:

"Authorities in Puerto Rico have detained 13 migrants from Cuba who were
found on an uninhabited island. U.S. Customs and Border Protection said Tues-
day that the group was found on Mona Island just west of the U.S. territory. The
seven men and six women detained Monday are expected to appear before an
immigration judge soon..."



Wednesday, January 6, 2016

Zika Virus Reaches Puerto Rico

















From Latin Post:


Earlier this month, news broke out that the Zika virus which cause micro-
cephaly in newborn babies reached Puerto Rico. As per Inquisitr, Puerto
Rico's representative in congress, Pedro Pierluisi released a statement re-
garding Zika fever.

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed the first Zika
virus case in Puerto Rico. The said virus already infested Puerto Rico's neigh-
boring countries such as Brazil, the Dominican Republic, Colombia, Paragu-
ay and Mexico. Puerto Rico's Health Secretary, Ana Rius, was the one who
confirmed that the Zika virus that hit the Puerto Rican victim was acquired
from a local mosquito after a thorough investigation considering the fact that
the patient has not traveled recently.

As per Pierluisi, though the virus may have reached Puerto Rico, residents
should not panic as it is only a single case. He did however warn the public
to make necessary precautions such as wearing long pants and using insect
repellents...[CONTINUE READING]



Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Puerto Rico vs Cuba: A rivalry in the making?


Forbes

Matt Schiavenza

















Many, including Pope Francis, are calling for “reconciliation” between
the U.S. and Cuba. But will opening Cuba’s tourism hurt Puerto Rico?

Soon after Pope Francis landed in Cuba last weekend, he urged the U.S.
and Cuban governments to further reconcile. “We have witnessed an event
which filled us with hope: the process of normalizing relations between two
peoples following years of estrangement,” the pontiff said.

President Obama already relaxed the 55-year-old Cuban embargo and ann-
ounced last week a raft of other measures intending to strengthen economic
ties between the two countries. But, the U.S.-Cuba rapprochement has some
practical implications that go far beyond...[CONTINUE READING]




Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Will A New Cuba Hurt Puerto Rican Tourism?

Feature
Bill Alvarez

Old Havana, Cuba
Old Havana, Cuba
Source: Wikimedia
Varadero Beach, Cuba
Varadero Beach, Cuba
President Obama recently surprised America and the world by revealing that he wants to start the process of normalizing relations with Cuba. This piece of news came shortly after the announcement that US contractor Alan Gross -- who had been held prisoner in Cuba for years -- was being exchanged for three Cuban spies who had been incarcerated in the US. This all represents a huge change in US-Cuba relations, which have been extremely strained -- to say the least -- since the communist takeover of the early 1960s. After more than 50 years of isolation, a trade embargo and practically no diplomatic contact between the two nations, Cuba now seems poised to further open itself to the world, especially to its giant, powerful neighbor to the north. Many Americans have been travelling to Cuba for years, although not officially as tourists. With an expected opening of Cuba-US trade and diplomacy, the number of Americans visiting Cuba will almost certainly skyrocket. But what does this mean for fellow Caribbean island Puerto Rico, and its tourism sector?
Puerto Ricans in the travel and tourism industries have long feared an "opening" of Cuba. Although seen by most as inevitable, such an opening always carried with it the threat of Cuba stealing whatever thunder Puerto Rico has as a Spanish-speaking, Caribbean destination. And there indeed are some real reasons to worry. If Cuba opens itself up to American tourism, visitors will find a destination with beaches, old buildings and natural attractions just as good as the ones in Puerto Rico, along with a great musical scene, cheap and delicious rum and premium coffee and cigars. And on top of that, everything will be cheaper than it is in PR. For the American tourist looking for a more "genuine" travel experience, Cuba offers practically no tacky American fast food joints or big box stores (for now!), relatively little crime or extreme poverty and a slower pace. As it is, millions of tourists from around the world already enjoy what Cuba has to offer. Cuba received 2.8 million tourists in 2013 (not counting any Americans or Cubans). While Puerto Rico received more visitors in 2013 (3.2 million), it did not have to deal with a commercial embargo, nor was it diplomatically isolated from much of the world. More ominously, in March 2014 (the most recent month for which we have data), Cuba received more visitors than Puerto Rico did (359,384 vs 182,599 arrivals). So you could say that the problems for PR on the tourism front have already started.
Luquillo, Puerto Rico
Luquillo, Puerto Rico
Old San Juan, PR
Old San Juan, PR
This is all not to say that Cuba does not face serious challenges, not only in the tourism sector, but across the board. Aging infrastructure is probably the largest obstacle. Also, some of that non-consumerist charm that Cuba has may also serve to repel certain potential visitors, especially convenience-conscious Americans, who expect destinations to have wifi, digital cable, 24 hour restaurants and other amenities. As tourism increases, a rise in crime and other social ills can also be expected, and to some extent this is already being seen. But can Cuba become a modern, state-of-the-art, world-class destination within the next decade? It absolutely can. And unless other Caribbean destinations like Puerto Rico can keep up, Cuba will steal a good part of their tourist arrivals.
Puerto Rico has long been trying to step up its tourism game, with mixed results. Unfortunately for the island, electricity costs have always been (and continue to be) relatively high, and labor costs are higher than in the rest of the area. Add to this potential visitors' concerns over the island's much-publicized imploding economy and its crime rate, and it's easy to see how someone trying to pick a Caribbean spot for vacation in the near future will find it easier to just choose Cuba. The one thing PR will still have over Cuba is that travel to the island from the US requires no passport (as it is a US territory) and American visitors can come with the knowledge that they have the safety of being under the US flag. That, however, doesn't seem to have helped PR take any tourist arrivals from emerging destinations like the Dominican Republic. While the tourism picture in Puerto Rico has shown some improvement, and continues to do so in some areas (cheaper real estate may be one driver), it's going to have to become very creative and diligent in the medium and long term in order to not lose scores of tourist arrivals to an ascendant Cuba. Whatever the case, Americans visiting the Caribbean in the following years will have one more option when choosing a destination.